|
|
| Welcome
to Inside AXIS, our newsletter aimed at giving you,
our client, tips and information that can help with your daily
work. Articles can be quickly accessed using the menu bar on
the left hand side of your screen. You can also scroll down
the screen to read the articles, including useful links. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A new valuation Reserve Method is being developed in AXIS
to support a Cost of Capital approach to valuation. Reserve
Method option (37) Present value of cash flow plus cost of
capital is currently available in the Regular Life module
for testing. In addition, a new approach to determining
required solvency capital is being added by way of a new
table option in the Required Surplus section of the cell.
The Cost of Capital method for including a market value
of margins (“MVM”) in the calculation of an insurance
liability was specified for use in the fourth quantitative
impact study (“QIS4”) for Solvency II in Europe. This MVM
approach is one of the proposals for valuing insurance
contracts under International Financial Reporting Standards
(“IFRS”).
Cost of Capital methods add an MVM that is the present
value of the return, in addition to the amount earned from
assets backing capital, that is required for the total
return to be adequate for the risk assumed in the product.
The MVM is added to the best estimate value of the
liability. The best estimate value is equal to the
probability weighted average of all future cash flows,
taking account of the time value of money.
Under QIS4, required solvency capital is determined as a
combination of the amounts of extra cost resulting from
adverse effects of the potential risk components contained
within the insurance products and the assets backing those
products. The risks that need to be taken into account are
operational risk, underwriting risk with respect to existing
business and counterparty default risk with respect to ceded
reinsurance. Within AXIS, the extra cost for each assumption
is assessed as the excess of the liability required under a
shocked scenario over the liability required under the base
best estimate scenario.
- Gordon Creber |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Those days when the actuary performed all work on the
desktop computer are long gone. Sure, you can buy a
quad-core workstation and run almost four times more
calculations per second, but it is often still not enough.
Even if it was, all the new regulations require you to keep
the data on a secure network drive, and your IT staff is
increasingly reluctant to support applications scattered
across individual desktops. Nowadays you need a powerful
grid of servers to run stochastic calculations, terabytes of
storage to keep all the results, a user-friendly environment
for model development and testing, and yet a secure and
automated environment for production runs where no human
interaction is allowed. You need to be able to secure your
data, and at the same time have a way to share it
efficiently with other users who need access to your work.
How do you manage all that, satisfy your auditor’s
requirements, and still have time for productive actuarial
work? Well, it is a challenge. To help organize all the
work, AXIS already provides a wide range of features such
as:
- AXIS VBA-like scripting (Dataset and System Formulae)
- AXIS DataLink
- Import/Export
- Built-in Backup/Restore
- User Profiles
On the production side, AXIS GridLink is an extraordinary
tool to manage the grid of servers and perform distributed
runs.
You just need to put this all together. Where do you
start? We are hearing from more and more companies that they
are looking to create secure, multi-user, server-based AXIS
environments for front-end model development and testing,
and back-end production processing. Great idea! Make your
users more productive and comply with regulations, but again
– how? That is why GGY recently started a new and exciting
project to not only bring all these great AXIS tools
together, but also add a suite of new features to provide
users with a truly powerful data management platform. We
call it AXIS EnterpriseLink. It will organize the work in
your department, and will scale all the way to the
enterprise level.
 Imagine these new possibilities:
- Version control for your dataset archives
- Automated archive for calculated results
- Schedulers for automated runs
- User and user groups control
- Logging and audit tools
- Enterprise level reporting tools
- Centralized deployment and remote access
- Scalable model development environment for multiple
users
- Safe backup and disaster recovery tools
- Seamless integration with AXIS GridLink farms
- Integration with AXIS EnterpriseLink systems in other
departments of the company
Imagine all that and your familiar great tools in AXIS
connected together – all under “one roof”. Now you can
concentrate on the work you love. Stay tuned.-
Victor Rubinstein
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global equity markets have fallen sharply over the last
12 months. For writers of Variable Annuity (VA) and Seg Fund
contracts with equity-based guarantees, these sharp declines
have pushed some of these guarantees into the money and have
elevated the overall scrutiny of the ALM strategies used to
manage these valuable embedded options. The hedging of VA
guarantees has certainly become a hot topic in the insurance
industry worldwide and regulators, rating agencies and
company directors are asking companies to demonstrate the
effectiveness of their hedge programs, or urgently consider
the development of programs where none previously existed. The word “hedging” has come to be synonymous with dynamic
matching of exotic financial derivatives using the very
familiar Greek metrics (e.g. Delta, Gamma, Vega and Rho).
But some companies also consider accounting exposures in
their hedging programs. In either case, a dynamic hedging
program comes with operational complexities, but also with
the need for practical solutions that may conflict with
theoretical exactness. In short, hedging can be an expensive
undertaking for any insurer, regardless of size. In recent years, hedging has generally been a purely risk
management exercise, conducted in back offices by
specialists using specialized software. In many cases, the
specialists and their software were rented from consulting
firms, and not well integrated with mainstream actuarial
systems and operations. This has presented problems in
reflecting the hedging strategy being followed in financial
projections or reserves, and in demonstrating to
stakeholders the actual or projected hedge effectiveness. As hedging is becoming more widespread and practices are
evolving, actuaries and risk managers want to become more
involved in the evaluation and decision-making about hedge
strategies. GGY will soon be able to address this need. For
the past 24 months, with assistance from well-known industry
pioneering expert, Dr. K. (Ravi) Ravindran, GGY has been putting key
components of hedging functionality into AXIS that will give
actuaries a powerful tool to evaluate and demonstrate the
effectiveness or cost of various hedge strategies. Even
better, being fully integrated within AXIS, this
functionality is a powerful extension of an existing, proven
and widely used modeling system. Some of the challenges
which GGY is facing and addressing
within this project include:
- The definition of an “asset pricing model” that will
use generated risk neutral scenarios to reflect the cost
of embedded options, the prices of various hedge
instruments that might be chosen as hedges, and the
Greek metrics that link them together.
- Enhancing the existing Economic Scenario structure
to include multiple market indices on which hedge assets
might be based, and parameters defining the volatility
surfaces for these indices necessary to execute hedge
strategies within financial projections.
- The addition of new asset types to facilitate the
management of the required hedge positions.
- The parameterization and automation of hedge
strategy algorithms to optimize the selection of hedge
assets purchased based on the solution to a complex
linear programming problem.
GGY now is willing to make a prototype version of AXIS,
known as a Technological Preview, available for its current
users to gain an appreciation of our proposed approach to
defining and testing hedge strategies that are driven by
various equity guarantee features within accumulation
annuities. The purpose of this program is to allow
interested users to plan for the future integration of AXIS
into existing or developing hedging programs, and further to
enable these users to influence the development path and
specifics of this functionality through their feedback. A
beta version is anticipated to be ready later in 2009. In summary, AXIS functionality will soon respond to one of
the industry’s most important risk management needs.
Interested clients are welcome to request an onsite or
web-linked demo of this exciting feature. -
Trevor Howes and Jason Alleyne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AXIS version 12.4 saw the introduction of a second sample
dataset. This new dataset, which is included with every
installation of AXIS, is named Sample-US. The purpose of
this dataset is to develop examples of some of the US
functionality that is included in AXIS. This dataset
currently includes a single example on Cashflow Testing.
This example will provide the US user with a seamless run
that will load, massage and output results over the New York
7 scenarios and give the actuary enough information to judge
the adequacy of the reserves. The dataset includes a Word
document stored in the dataset directory. This document is
called Sample-US Index. This document gives a description of
the examples in the Dataset. The example currently in the
Dataset is detailed in the Special Features section of the
document. Please note that the other sample dataset,
called Sample, is still included with every installation of
AXIS.
- Marc Parisien |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starting in March 2009, we have rolled out a new
training course called
Tools in AXIS to Improve Efficiency. From responses
to our training surveys, we found that clients very much
appreciate learning little tips and tricks in AXIS. So
we brought together a bucket-load of tricks into this
new session. Over the course of the session, trainees
will complete two real-world type projects (one pricing,
one valuation) where several "hidden" and key basic
features will be highlighted. We have also created a
separate training session for the
Stochastic Processing Module. For those who haven't
become familiar with this module, it gives extreme power
and control during large scenario runs. This half day
session will go through the basics of setting up models
useful for Seg Fund MCCSR, DCAT, Economic Capital,
financial statement projections, C3 Phase 2 and VA-CARVM
calculations. This is really the future of modeling
work.
Sign up for one of these sessions in-house
at
http://www.ggy.com/support/training/coursetimetables.asp
or contact Wes Leong to arrange the training.
- Wes Leong |
|
|
|
|
|
|
GGY is pleased to announce the first series of training videos of recent enhancements and features added to AXIS:
- AXIS/BondEdge Link
- AXIS DataLink – Recent New Features
- AXIS GridLink Active Backup
- AXIS GridLink – Other Recent New Features
- Category Reports
- Equity Indexed Annuities
- Output Manager
- Premium Calculation Tables
- Required Surplus
- Reserve Reconciliation and Reserve Components Reports
- Run Filters
- Scenario Sets and Market Models
- Stochastic Processing and Memory Management
Visit
http://www.ggy.com/support/training/videos/playvideo.asp to watch and learn more about these exciting new developments, and stay tuned for more videos that describe continuous improvements to AXIS.
-
Karim Sajan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is not every
day you see software hit a big anniversary like twenty
years. Most software is much more short lived, or by the
time it hits a milestone like this, it is well past the
“best-before” date. AXIS is different. It was ahead of its
time in 1989, and it is certainly on the leading edge today.
How is this possible?
- Dumb luck. Never
underestimate the importance of luck. Many of the
fundamental concepts of AXIS that were in the first releases
turned out to provide a fundamentally sound basis for all
future developments. For example, AXIS was always
“convergent software”, using the same codebase for
valuation, pricing and modeling. AXIS was always “object
oriented”, even before developers switched to an object
oriented programming language. AXIS always had a complete
separation of source code and data. It sounds obvious, but
even today most competitors have not achieved this
separation.
- Single minded determination. From 1989 to 1991 we
did both consulting and AXIS development, but since 1991 we
have never taken our eye off the ball by offering consulting
services or developing any other products (illustration or
admin systems for example). We do nothing else but AXIS, so
we had better do it very well!
- Long-term perspective. The partners of GGY have
always taken the long view. We do not try to cash in to
maximize short-term profits. We are happy to invest in
expensive long-term development to keep AXIS ahead of the
pack. For example, at one time DataLink was a separate
application. We embarked on a multi-year project to
integrate DataLink into AXIS because we felt that in the
long term it was the right structure. History has proven us
right on this.
- We hire the best. The most important management
decisions are who you hire and what you do to train them
and retain them. It is not easy working at GGY – there is so
much to learn, always, even for those of us who have been
around since the early days. We hire people who have the
ability and the interest to learn, and they have repaid us
by their incredible creativity and dedication. We are very
fortunate that so many bright people have applied to work
here. We rarely advertize specific positions – we are simply
always on the lookout for people who can make our team
stronger.
- We are never afraid to admit mistakes. Yes, we
make mistakes. We wouldn’t be human if we didn’t. What sets
us apart is our dedication to fix every mistake we ever
made. Unlike other software vendors, we fix every single
bug, and we do so as soon as it is found. But that’s not the
only kind of mistake. When we find something in the
structure of AXIS that leads to a roadblock to ongoing
development, we always take the time and make the effort to
re-engineer such weaknesses. For example, until recently the
Calendar Year results were a fixed list of available lines,
to which we added new lines from time to time. Whenever we
would add new lines (to meet the needs of particular
clients) that would mean the system would run slower. We
designed a new architecture involving optional Category
Reports that resolves that weakness. Earlier, we were in DOS
when the future was Windows. We rebuilt AXIS from the ground
up to take full advantage of Windows, but unlike some of our
competitors, we did not charge an upgrade fee. We do not
consider that a mistake! We continually adapt and use
cutting edge tools, the latest compiler and grid technology.
We also test on the latest hardware and operating systems,
and optimize for them. All this is made much easier because
unlike most competitors, we have total control of the source
code, and are free to make structural changes if necessary.
- We invest in quality. We have a separate Quality
Control team, plus individual testing and checking
requirements and a battery of testing computers to make sure
the product is as robust and accurate as we can make it. The
quality control team reports to me and will not allow any
version to be released until they are absolutely satisfied
with it. Our systems programmers are continually developing
new testing tools for the developers and testers, and we
incorporate many of these tools directly into AXIS so you
can perform your own regression analysis.
- We treat our staff well. That’s not because we’re
just such nice guys. We value the experience they have built
up over the years, and we want to keep them happy so that
they will stick around and treat you the customer well. So
we have a great location, spacious modern offices, plenty of
fast computers and other high tech devices; whatever it
takes to support the staff and the ongoing development of
AXIS. We do not cut corners.
- We stick to our word. It is almost unheard of for
a software developer to deliver on time and to
specifications. If we promise you a feature by a specific
date, you can bet on it.
- We listen. We listen to you, and we listen to each
other. By listening to a broad range of clients about their
needs, and incorporating the best of these into our
development plans, we are able to make sure the software is
always moving in the right direction. We are very active in
developing close contacts with our user community, and the
increased level of feedback pays major dividends. They call
this the wisdom of the crowd. So give yourselves a pat on
the back!
- We love what we do here. We really believe this is
the right product with the right service, and if we ever
changed our belief about what the right product is, we would
change AXIS accordingly.
All of these things have contributed to making AXIS a
superior product over the last two decades. While some may
think it is easy to "rest on our laurels" after such an
achievement, let me assure you that we will not! The
partners and staff of GGY are committed to extending our
efforts well into the future, to continue to provide our
clients with the best possible product and service. -
Phil Gold |
|
|
|